David D. Kirkpatrick reported about militia issues that have
arisen in Libya after the assault that killed the American ambassador and his
constituents last month. In an article called, “Libya Struggles to Curb
Militias, The Only Police” from The New
York Times Kirkpatrick revealed that Libya’s militias, who supplement the
regular army in an emergency, have resisted government control. Their resistance
makes it more difficult for Libyan authorities and the United States to find
the actual attackers and killers of the American ambassador. The public blames
the death of the ambassador on the lack of protection from militias. Therefore,
thousands of people filled the streets last month to demand the dismantling of
the militias. After the president told them to back off, some of the leaders of
the militia units threatened to cut off any service that they provide, such as
putting out fires and patrolling the borders. If the militias retreat from
these services, Libya will be under huge threats of being attacked from the
outside. While some complain that the militia does not do their intended jobs,
others report witnessing the militia carrying out the attack. A hospital
administrator where a militia unit’s men served as guards stated, “They are
very nice people. Security has been ‘on shaky ground’ since the militia fled” (The New York Times). The man, who felt the affects of security
before and after the assistance of militias, is a perfect example for the rest
of society that they will never be secure without these militias. They cannot afford
not having these militias, especially after a serious assault that killed the ambassador
last month.
No comments:
Post a Comment